NYC00LA167
2000-06-18 · CHESWOLD, Delaware, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 33N
N407DS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (DIAMOND AIRCRAFT DA 40, built 2004), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The instructor's delayed remedial action. Factors included the instructor's failure to take positive control of the airplane, and the student's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the approach.
Factual narrative
On June 18, 2000, at 1050 Eastern Daylight Time, a Piper PA-38, N407DS, was substantially damaged when it landed short of the runway at Delaware Airpark (33N), Cheswold, Delaware. The certificated flight instructor and the certificated student pilot were uninjured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. No flight plan had been filed for the local instructional flight, which was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the flight instructor, the airplane was on a stabilized final approach to Runway 27, at 65 knots indicated airspeed, with the student at the controls. The student reduced power, the airspeed went below 60 knots, and airplane began to "sink." The instructor told the student to watch his airspeed, "but no corrective action was taken." At that point, with the airplane about 200 feet above the ground, the instructor initiated a go-around. However, on short final, "the student observed the airspeed slow and pushed over the control wheel drastically...the student was pushing forward while I was pulling aft and adding power." The instructor further stated that the student overcame the instructor's inputs, and that the left main landing gear became entangled in tall grass and brush. The airplane yawed to the left and was pulled downwards. It impacted the ground, skidded sideways, and came to rest 20 to 30 feet prior to the runway threshold. According to the student pilot, the airplane was high on final approach, so he reduced power. When he thought he had the runway made, the student reduced additional power, "which caused the airspeed to decrease too much. The instructor took the controls, but it was too late [and] we were too low...." The airplane was on the final approach segment of a visual pattern, with the student pilot at the controls. The student reduced power, the airspeed bled off, and airplane began to sink. The instructor told the student to watch his airspeed, but no corrective action was taken. When the airplane was about 200 feet above the ground, the instructor initiated a go-around. The instructor felt the student push forward on the controls, while the instructor was trying to pull aft and add power. The airplane's left main landing gear became entangled in tall grass and brush. The airplane then yawed left, and impacted the ground. It skidded sideways, and came to rest 20 to 30 feet prior to the runway threshold. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_NYC00LA167.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…