Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / NYC01IA199

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event NYC01IA199

2001-07-19 Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Airport · TEB None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N3337J

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

BOMBARDIER INC BD-100-1A10

Year of manufacture

2011

TCDS

T00005NY · BOMBARDIER INC

Engine

HONEYWELL AS907-1-1A

Seats / Engines

8 seats · 2 engines

Last airworthiness date

20120309

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A3A44A

Registrant of record

BIG HORNS LEASING LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The right aft rudder cable being installed over a cable guide by maintenance personnel.

Factual narrative

On July 19, 2001, about 1445 eastern daylight time, a Raytheon 400A, N3337J, experienced a flight control malfunction while on approach to the Teterboro Airport (TEB), Teterboro, New Jersey. The airplane landed without incident, and neither of the certificated airline transport pilots were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the positioning flight that originated at Dillant Hopkins Airport (EEN), Keene, New Hampshire. An instrument flight rules flight plan was filed and activated for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the captain, the airplane was approximately 10 miles west of Teterboro at 4,000 feet msl, and indicating 220 knots of airspeed, when there was an abnormal yaw input. At first, he thought the yaw dampener had failed. He selected the dampener to "OFF," but did not regain normal rudder control. The captained continued the approach, and landed uneventfully. Inspection by maintenance personnel revealed that the right rudder cable had separated. According to maintenance records, the airplane had been towed with the nosewheel steering engaged, resulting in damage to the rudder portion of the flight control system. On June 14, 2001, the damage was repaired, which included replacing the forward and aft right rudder cables. Since the cables were replaced, the airplane flew 50.6 hours before the right aft cable separated. According to manufacturer records, the rudder cable came from a 1,000-foot reel that was shipped from the cable manufacturer to the airframe manufacturer on November 16, 2000. Prior to being shipped, a sample of the reel was taken and tested. According to the test results, required breaking strength was 2,500 pounds, and the actual breaking strength of the sample was 3,190 pounds. The rudder cable was sent to the Safety Board's Material Laboratory for examination. According to the metallurgist that conducted the examination, the cable met its original design specifications. He added that the fracture surfaces on the cable were consistent with overload created by a bend or kink in the cable. Examination of the cable guide revealed a shiny wear pattern with no scrapes or gouges. According to a representative for the airplane manufacturer, the break in the aft right rudder cable was 14 inches from the swage, which placed it within 1 inch of the aft cable guide for the right aft rudder pulley. Two separate cases involving flight control cables being installed over a cable guide were examined. In both cases, the cables separated, but the cable guides remained intact. The first incident involved a Beech 1900. In that incident, an elevator trim cable was installed over a cable guide. Examination of a photograph taken of the cable guide revealed a shiny wear pattern with no deep scrapes or gouges. The second incident involved a rudder cable for a Beech A36, which also was installed over a cable guide. Examination of a photograph taken of that cable guide also revealed a shiny wear pattern with no deep scrapes or gouges. The airplane was approximately 10 miles west of the airport at 4,000 feet msl, and indicating 220 knots of airspeed, when the captain felt an abnormal yaw input. At first, he thought the yaw dampener had failed. He selected the dampener to "OFF," but did not regain normal rudder control. The captained continued the approach, and landed uneventfully. An inspection by maintenance personnel revealed that the right aft rudder cable had separated. The cable was change 50.6 hours before the incident. The incident rudder cable met its original design specifications, and had separated in overload created by a bend or kink in the cable. Examination of the cable guide revealed a shiny wear pattern with no scrapes or gouges. The break in the rudder cable was within 1 inch of the aft cable guide for the right aft rudder pulley. Two separate incidents involving flight control cables being improperly installed over a cable guide were examined. In both cases, the cables separated, but the cable guides remained intact. The wear patterns on the cable guides for the previous incidents were similar to that of the incident cable guide. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2001_NYC01IA199.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗