NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC99LA014
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain the airplane's directional control during a go-around.
Factual narrative
On October 21, 1998, about 1420 Eastern Daylight Time, a Piper PA-28R-201, N31869, was substantially damaged during landing at Mattituck Airbase (21N), Mattituck, New York. The certificated commercial pilot and passenger were uninjured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. No flight plan was filed for the flight between Teterboro Airport (TEB), Teterboro, New Jersey, and Mattituck. The business flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector, the airplane was inbound to Mattituck to deliver engine parts. The passenger, who was also a student pilot, was in the left seat and the commercial pilot was flying from the right seat. The commercial pilot attempted to land on Runway 19, then decided to go around. The airplane drifted off the left side of the runway and collided with trees. In a written statement, the commercial pilot stated he flew over the airfield, and used the windsock to determine the wind direction and select the runway. He cleared 50-foot trees at the approach end of the runway, and brought the power to idle in order to descend. He was about 25 feet above the runway, when he realized there would not be enough runway remaining to land safely, so he initiated a go-around. A few seconds later he heard a noise that sounded like the "impact of tree tops." Winds recorded 27 minutes prior to the accident, at an airport 9 nautical miles south, were from 310 degrees magnetic, varying between 290 and 360, at 12 knots. An airport 27 miles to the east reported winds from 270 degrees magnetic at 8 knots, 26 minutes prior to the accident. An airport 26 miles to southwest reported winds from 280 degrees magnetic at 10 knots, 30 minutes prior to the accident. The commercial pilot was flying from the right seat, and the passenger, who was also a student pilot, was in the left seat. The commercial pilot attempted to land, but when he felt it could not be done safely, he decided to perform a go-around. The airplane drifted off the left side of the runway and collided with trees during the go-around. Winds were from the right, about 10 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_NYC99LA014.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗