NTSB CAROL · Event
Event OPS10IA090
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The improper separation procedures by air traffic control.
Factual narrative
On Monday, April 19, 2010 at approximately 1058 pacific daylight time, Southwest Air Lines (SWA) flight 649, a Boeing 737-700 and N4415R, a Cessna 172 were involved in a near collision on the surface at the Bob Hope Airport (BUR), Burbank, California. The B737 was landing on runway 8, and the C172 was in the departure phase of a touch and go on runway 15, when it passed airborne through the intersection in front of the B737 flight. The incident occurred during daytime visual meteorological conditions (VMC). The B737 was on a regularly scheduled passenger flight from Metropolitan Oakland International Airport (OAK), Oakland, California enroute to BUR and was operating under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Air Regulation Part 121. The Southwest flight had 119 passengers and a crew of five onboard. No injuries were reported. The C172 was practicing take-offs and landings at BUR, and was operating under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The C172 had one person onboard. No injuries were reported. At approximately 1046, N4415R reported in to BUR air traffic control tower (ATCT) requesting touch and go approaches in the traffic pattern. The C172 completed one touch and go to runway 8 and was then instructed by ATC to enter a left downwind for runway 15 for his second approach. Approximately two minutes later, the B737 reported in to BUR ATCT on approximately an 8-mile final for an instrument landing system (ILS) approach to runway 8. The local controller (LC) issued the B737 a landing clearance to runway 8, and then subsequently issued the C172 a touch and go clearance to runway 15. Immediately following those clearances, the LC became moderately busy providing traffic advisories to other aircraft in the airspace; however, the B737 and C172 were not provided traffic advisories on each other. Approximately two minutes later, the C172 was airborne in the departure phase of a touch and go on runway 15 and passed through the intersection of runway 15/8 in front of the B737 landing on runway 8. According to the LC and the controller in charge (CIC), they did not see the situation develop between the C172 and B737, because another aircraft that had just departed distracted them, and their attention was focused on the radar display, not out the tower window. The LC and CIC first became aware of the situation when the clearance delivery/flight data controller (CD/FD) looked out of the window and saw said “hey!” when he saw the C172 airborne and climbing over the intersection, and the landing B737 flight rolling through the same intersection, perpendicular to each other. The B737 continued to his gate, and C172 completed two more approaches at BUR before departing toward Van Nuys. Burbank airport had several video cameras located on the airfield that were used by airport operations. One of those cameras captured the incident. The replay of the video indicated that approximately 10 seconds had lapsed from the time C172 passed over the runway intersection before B737 had rolled through that same intersection. A Boeing 737 (B737) was landing on runway 8 and a Cessna 172 (C172) was operating in the local touch-and-go traffic pattern when the C172, in the departure phase of a touch and go on runway 15, flew through the intersection of runway 8 in front of the B737, which was on landing rollout. According to the local controller and the controller-in-charge, they did not see the situation develop between the C172 and B737 because another aircraft, which had just departed, distracted them, and their attention was focused on the radar display, not out the tower window. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Expectation/assumption-ATC personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Forgotten action/omission-ATC personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Expectation/assumption-ATC personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Forgotten action/omission-ATC personnel - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_OPS10IA090.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗