NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR13LA408
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power during final approach for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examinations did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
On September 14, 2013, about 1224 mountain standard time, a Cessna 182A, N6324B, sustained substantial damage during a forced landing while on approach to landing at the Casa Grande Municipal Airport, Casa Grande, Arizona. The airplane was registered to Aivcon Inc., and operated by Phoenix Aerial Skydiving under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The commercial pilot, sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local skydiving flight which originated from CGZ about 24 minutes before the accident. The pilot reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC) that he had performed six flights earlier in the day for skydiving operations. After the sixth flight the pilot had the airplane refueled by a local fixed base operator and requested that each wing fuel tank have 10 gallons added. The pilot stated that the lineman told him the right tank only took a couple of gallons before it was full. The pilot visually verified that the right fuel tank was full and then requested that the lineman put seven gallons in the left tank. The pilot stated that he should have had a total of 40 gallons onboard the airplane following refueling. The pilot performed three more skydiving flights. The pilot reported that as he was on final approach to landing, he noted the engine oil and temperature was in the green and he performed his GUMPS checklist, a before landing checklist. He stated that during the descent and prior to reaching final approach, he would perform this GUMPS checklist and confirm that the carburetor heat was in the "On" position. He further stated that this was "part of his flow" when preparing to land. About 100-feet above ground level he added throttle and the engine did not respond. He verified that the engine controls were in their full forward positions. Despite his efforts, he was unable to restart the engine and subsequently initiated a forced landing to an open area adjacent to the airport. During the landing roll the airplane impacted a ditch and nosed over. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector revealed that the left wing was buckled and the vertical stabilizer and rudder were damaged. The inspector noted the smell of fuel at the accident site and that the airplane had been leaking fuel from the wings. The airplane wreckage was recovered from the accident site and transported to a secure facility for subsequent examination. According to the recovery team, 7 gallons were removed from the right fuel tank and 11 gallons were removed from the left fuel tank. The recovered engine and airframe were examined by representatives from the FAA and the NTSB IIC. The Continental O-470-R engine was prepared for a test run on the airframe by utilizing a fuel source attached to the wing tank inlets at the wing roots. The carburetor inlet screen was removed and was partially blocked about one-third with light fibrous debris. The engine was started and ran smoothly for several minutes at various power settings. The examination of the engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the cabin fuel gages revealed that they were inoperative. The airframe fuel system, from the wing root area to the engine was examined and no anomalies were noted. Both wing tank fuel bladders were examined. The left bladder was found loose from one of its upper attach points. The right wing fuel cap was removed and the tank bladder had a large fold visible on the lower surface of the bladder directly below the filler neck area. The fold was about 2.5 inches in height and ran diagonally from the aft wing root area to the leading edge side of the bladder tank, about 2 feet outboard from the wing root area. The right wing fuel sending unit was removed and was undamaged. The fuel bladder interior surfaces were visible from the fuel sending unit's mounting flange. The interior surfaces of the bladder showed multiple folds on the lower surface and a drooping upper surface outboard and aft of the filler neck area. The fuel bladder was removed and several hanger clips were not attached to their wing structure attach points. The forward outboard hanger clip and the two forward inboard hanger clips remained attached to the wing structure. The bladder was removed from the wing and the upper aft outboard hanger clip and two lower aft outboard hanger clips were not found. Weather conditions recorded at the CGZ, at 1235, were wind 130 degrees at 4 knots, visibility 10 statute miles, clear sky, temperature 35 degrees Celsius, dew point 16 degrees Celsius, and an altimeter setting of 29.71 inches of mercury. According to the Federal Aviation Administration Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin, entitled Carburetor Icing Prevention, the temperature and dew point were conducive to the formation of icing at glide power. A review of the airplane's maintenance logbooks revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on August 30, 2013. The logbook entry for the annual inspection stated that seven upper fuel bladder hanger clips were replaced on the left bladder tank and the right bladder tank was replaced. An airworthiness directive (AD) preventing power loss or engine stoppage due to water contamination of the fuel system, is a detailed inspection of the wing fuel bladder tank assemblies and was reportedly complied with at the last annual inspection 15 days prior to the accident. The pilot reported that, while on final approach, he performed the landing checklist and confirmed that the carburetor heat was on. About 100 feet above ground level, he advanced the throttle; however, the engine did not respond. The pilot verified that the mixture, throttle, and propeller setting were in the full-forward position, but, despite his efforts, the engine would not restart. He subsequently initiated a forced landing to an open area. During the landing, the airplane impacted a ditch and nosed over. Seven gallons of fuel were found in the right fuel tank, and 11 gallons of fuel were found in the left fuel tank. A postaccident examination and operational run of the recovered engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Although the reported weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the accumulation of carburetor icing at glide power, the pilot reported that he used carburetor heat, which would have prevented the accumulation of ice. The reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Effect on equipment
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_WPR13LA408.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper
The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗