Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / WPR18LA044

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event WPR18LA044

2017-12-04 Glendale, Arizona, United States Airport · GEU None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N47536

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

PIPER PA-34-200T

Year of manufacture

1977 · 40 years old at event

Engine

CONT MOTOR TSIO-360 SER (225 hp)

Seats / Engines

7 seats · 2 engines

Last airworthiness date

19770926

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A5D68D

Registrant of record

ANGEL AVIATION INC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplane during the landing roll. Contributing to the accident was the fatigue of the left main landing gear assembly.

Factual narrative

On December 5, 2017, about 1835 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-34-200T, N47536, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Glendale, Arizona. The flight instructor and the commercial pilot were not injured. The airplane was as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The instructor reported that the commercial pilot receiving instruction, who was flying the airplane, successfully completed two simulated engine failure maneuvers in the traffic pattern. During the third traffic pattern, the instructor initiated a right engine failure. While on base, the pilot extended the landing gear and verbally confirmed that all three landing gear lights were green, which indicated the landing gear were down and locked. Upon touchdown, the left wing "dipped" and the airplane bounced back into the air. The instructor took the flight controls and, in an attempt to climb, applied full power to both engines; however, the nose of the airplane dropped, and the airplane started to drift toward the left side of the runway. The instructor determined that the airplane would not climb, and he retarded both throttle and mixture controls and attempted to maintain directional control while simultaneously applying brakes to stop. The airplane departed the left side of the runway and came to a complete stop in the adjacent dirt area. The instructor also reported that "the left landing gear malfunctioned" upon touchdown. Examination of the accident site revealed that the airplane landed with all three-landing gear extended; each tire's skid mark was visible on the runway surface to the left of the centerline. Additionally, the landing gear imprints were visible in the dirt where the airplane veered off the runway. The runway edge light and the 1,000-ft distance marker showed evidence of the left propeller/nose impacts. The left main landing gear collapsed after it impacted the distance marker, as evidenced by wide tire marks as the airplane started to roll on the sidewall of the left tire. Examination of the left main landing gear fracture surface revealed slant fractures consistent with an overstress failure. One small area of the fracture surface, coincident with the forging flash line, exhibited a flat fracture surface. A sample that contained the flat fracture area was further examined under the scanning electron microscope, which revealed striations consistent with a fatigue fracture. The flight instructor reported that, during touchdown, the left wing "dipped" and the instructor initiated an aborted landing. After determining that the airplane would not climb, the instructor reduced engine power and attempted to stop the airplane, which veered off the runway surface, impacted a sign, and came to rest in the dirt adjacent to the runway. The instructor later reported that the left main landing gear had "malfunctioned" upon touchdown. Examination of the accident site revealed that the airplane landed left of the runway centerline with all three landing gear extended; the first indication of the collapsed gear was visible in a dirt area on the left side of the runway behind a runway distance marker. Although examination of the left main landing gear revealed a small area of fatigue, the majority of the fracture surface exhibited signatures consistent with overstress failure; therefore, it is likely that the gear fractured due to overstress following the runway excursion and impact with a sign. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Directional control-Not attained/maintained - C
  • C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
  • Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Fatigue/wear/corrosion

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2017_WPR18LA044.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure, runway excursion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗