NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR19LA170
Registry · N9WU
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
JAMES TIMOTHY H EXPERIMENTAL CUB
Year of manufacture
2013 · 6 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING O-320-B2C (160 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20130504
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AC6C81
Registrant of record
HARTMAN MATTHEW F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Overstress failure of the right-wing spar due to an encounter with turbulence.
Factual narrative
On June 13, 2019, about 1320 mountain daylight time, an experimental, amateur-built Experimental Cub airplane, N9WU, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Stanley, Idaho. The pilot and passenger were seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that, while in the vicinity of the Sawtooth Mountain Range, the airplane encountered turbulence. As the flight continued, they encountered severe turbulence and he heard a “pop” sound. A few seconds later, the right wing began to shake "violently." He slowed the airplane and began to look for a place to land. He placed the airplane in a slight turn and the airplane encountered turbulence again. The airplane subsequently entered a spin and impacted the ground. The accident site elevation was 7,460 ft msl and adjacent to a mountain range. There were no pilot reports of turbulence in the area. Review of the surface analysis chart for 1200 on the day of the accident showed a low-pressure system over Idaho just south of the accident site, which was associated with a thermal low and a trough of low pressure that extended southward. Southeast of the accident site was a high-pressure system located over western Wyoming with a ridge of high pressure that extended westward into southeastern Idaho. The closest weather reporting station was the Stanley Ranger Station, Stanley, Idaho, about 2 miles northwest of the accident site at an elevation of 6,496 ft mean sea level (msl) and a calculated density altitude of 8,844 ft at the time of the accident. The station did not report precipitation, visibility, visibility restrictions, or sky conditions. At 1348, the wind was variable at 5 knots, temperature 23°C, dew point 6°C, altimeter 30.10 inches of mercury. A High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model sounding for the area over the accident site indicated a high probability of strong thermal activity from the surface through 7,000 ft agl. Portions of the right-wing strut and front and rear spar were sent to the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory for examination. The forward wing spar displayed an in-plane fracture surface, consistent with a tensile overstress. The other fracture surfaces were identified as overstress and were consistent with out-of-plane plastic deformation. These fracture surfaces occur after the initial fracture or failure event and are often associated with ground impact. While overflying mountainous terrain, the airplane encountered turbulence. The pilot heard a “pop” from the right wing and shortly thereafter, the wing began to shake violently. The pilot was maneuvering the airplane to a forced landing site when the airplane encountered turbulence again and subsequently entered a spin that continued until impact with terrain. The accident site was adjacent to a mountain range where strong thermals likely existed as well as an unstable low-level pressure system. This is likely the cause of the localized turbulence that was encountered by the flight. Examination of the wing spar revealed in-plane fractures consistent with tensile overstress failure. The fracture sequence started with the fracture of the wing spar, which led to subsequent spar fractures, and eventual buckling and fracture of the connected supporting members and struts. It is likely that the turbulence encounter resulted in excessive loads on the wing and subsequent overstress failure. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Turbulence-Terrain induced turbulence-Effect on equipment
- C Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Wing structure-Spar (on wing)-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_WPR19LA170.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Explainable LiDAR 3D Point Cloud Segmentation and Clustering for Detecting Airplane-Generated Wind Turbulence
Wake vortices - strong, coherent air turbulences created by aircraft - pose a significant risk to aviation safety and therefore require accurate and reliable detection methods.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Does small-scale turbulence matter for ice growth in mixed-phase clouds?
Representing the glaciation of mixed-phase clouds in terms of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is a challenge for many weather and climate models, which tend to overestimate this process because…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Effects of electrostatic interaction on clustering and collision of bidispersed inertial particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence
In sandstorms and thunderclouds, turbulence-induced collisions between solid particles and ice crystals lead to inevitable triboelectrification.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2023 · SKYbrary article
Wake Vortex Turbulence — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary wake vortex turbulence comprehensive article — generation mechanics, dissipation factors, separation standards (ICAO LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY/SUPER + recategorisation RECAT-EU).
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗