Event WPR20LA245

Factual narrative

On July 30, 2020, about 0938 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 337F, N337V, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Ennis, Montana. The right-front seat student pilot was fatally injured, and the left-front seat commercial pilot-in-command (PIC) and rear-seat passenger were seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal cross-country flight.   According to the PIC, he planned a route of flight from Helena, Montana, to Jackson Hole, Wyoming.  The PIC further reported that the right seat student pilot was flying the airplane about 3,000 ft above ground level.  When they decided to fly over a ski resort at Big Bear, Montana, the flying right-seat student pilot turned the airplane to the southeast in the direction of mountainous terrain.  The airplane subsequently entered a boxed canyon, and with a ridge now in the airplane’s flightpath that could not be cleared, the PIC took control of the airplane and attempted an evasive maneuver to exit the boxed canyon.  However, the evasive maneuver, which was unsuccessful, resulted in a stall/spin and subsequent impact with remote mountainous terrain.    The PIC opined that the accident should have been easily avoided by having more than sufficient altitude before entering mountainous terrain. Additionally, the PIC reported no mechanical anomalies with the airplane or engine prior to the accident that would have precluded normal operation. The rear seat passenger reported that they departed Helena at 0845 and that the “entirety of the flight was flown by the front left-seat pilot.” He further stated that the PIC was climbing in an attempt to clear a ridge when the airplane stalled and impacted terrain in a nose-down attitude. The Montana State Medical Examiner, Missoula, Montana, performed an autopsy on the student pilot and noted the cause of death as multiple blunt force injuries. Right Seat Student Pilot Medical Review Toxicology testing performed at the Federal Aviation Administration Forensic Sciences Laboratory identified 11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC [tetrahydrocannabinol] in the urine and its metabolite, carboxy-delta-9-THC was detected in the blood and urine. Levels of 11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC were 26.4 ng/mL and levels of carboxy-delta-9-THC were 3.1 ng/mL and 1225 ng/mL, respectively. Delta-9-THC (the primary psychoactive component in cannabis) was not detected. The cannabis plant contains chemicals called cannabinoids. Significant performance impairments are usually observed for at least 1-2 hours following cannabis use, and residual effects have been reported up to 24 hours. However, it is difficult to relate blood levels of delta-9-THC to effects, and there is no mechanism for relating levels in any other specimens to psychoactive effects. The left seat pilot-in-command (PIC) reported that, he passed the controls to the right seat student pilot once they were en route on the accident flight. The rear seat passenger’s postaccident statement indicated that the left seat pilot was at the controls for the duration of the flight; however, he may not have seen the exchange of the flight controls as he was seated behind both pilots at the time. As they were flying southbound on the cross-country flight over a valley about 3,000 ft above ground level, they agreed that they wanted to view a resort in the area. The student pilot then turned the airplane to the southeast towards higher mountainous terrain. After the airplane had entered a boxed canyon, and with a ridge in the airplane’s flightpath that it could not clear, the PIC took control of the airplane and attempted an evasive maneuver to reverse course to exit the canyon. However, during the maneuver, the PIC likely did not maintain sufficient airspeed, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin and subsequent impact with remote mountainous terrain. The PIC reported no mechanical anomalies with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Toxicology results indicated that the student pilot had used cannabis, but likely had metabolized it such that no detectable psychoactive chemicals remained in his blood. The toxicology results and the student pilot’s limited role in the accident flight suggest that the effects of cannabis use were unlikely to have contributed to the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

• — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained
• — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Capability exceeded
• — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
• — Personnel issues-Psychological-Attention/monitoring-Monitoring environment-Pilot
• — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Effect on operation