NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR23FA351
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A failure of the forward left wing spar due to an improper repair, which resulted in an inflight separation of the left wing. Contributing to the accident was improper maintenance by splicing the wing spar.
Factual narrative
On September 22, 2023, about 1446 Pacific daylight time, an unregistered experimental, amateur-built Golden Circle T-Bird II was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Arlington, Washington. The noncertificated pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to a witness who was standing in front of a hangar at Arlington Municipal Airport (AWO), he observed the accident airplane complete a series of what appeared to be practice takeoff maneuvers on the west side of the airport during which the airplane would become momentarily airborne. During the airplane’s final takeoff maneuver, it lifted off the ground toward the south and turned right. The airplane narrowly missed impacting trees before it disappeared behind hangars and trees on a northwesterly heading. The airplane reappeared, and the witness stated that it “looked like it was going to dive towards the runway” before the left wing separated in flight. Video of the accident flight taken from the east side of the airport showed the airplane appear above a group of trees on an easterly heading, approaching from the west side of the airport. The airplane turned toward the south and yawed rapidly before it turned to the southeast. Approximately 20 seconds later, the airplane then turned to an easterly heading and exhibited erratic changes in pitch and yaw. The airplane then turned right toward the northeast, crossed over runway 16/34, and continued to turn right at a steep bank angle, at which time it entered a nose-low attitude. Two seconds later, the left wing separated from the airplane; the airplane then entered a rapid descent. The engine’s sound was erratic throughout the video and ceased about 3 seconds after the left wing separated and the airplane started its rapid descent toward the ground. Pilot Information The pilot did not possess an FAA medical certificate, nor did he hold a valid FAA pilot certificate. Logbooks were not recovered to account for his total flight experience. Wreckage and Impact Information The airplane came to rest inverted in a grass area about 275 ft west of the approach end of runway 16. Several structural tubes were located between the main wreckage and separated left wing, which came to rest about 400 ft northeast of the main wreckage. Propeller blade fragments were located around the left wing. The right wing fabric was torn and each of the wing’s structural tubes were bent. The vertical stabilizer was crushed while rudder, horizontal stabilizer, and elevator remained undamaged. The engine remained attached to the fuselage and the propeller blades were attached to the crankshaft through the propeller hub. Figure 1: Wreckage diagram Postaccident examination of the engine did not reveal any preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The ailerons were traced from the cockpit to their flight control surfaces through multiple separations, all consistent with overload failure. According to the airplane installation manual, the wings are secured to the fuselage at the root tube (atop the fuselage structure) via two spars at each wing (forward and aft) and 4 wing struts (forward and aft for the left and right sides). The spars connected to the root tube assembly via bolts, washers, and castellated nuts. The forward and aft wing spars remained attached to the root tube assembly with all the securing hardware in place. The right wing spars exhibited signatures consistent with overload failure at the wing root. The forward left wing spar had been previously repaired and the spar tube was spliced, and a sleeve was installed to couple the separated sections of spar. The sleeve exhibited fracture signatures consistent with overload failure. The aft left wing spar also exhibited fracture signatures consistent with overload. The airplane maintenance records were not located. Figure 2: Left wing spar with splice and sleeve According to the kit manufacturer, they require customers to purchase replacement parts and would not approve a sleeve as a repair on any structure.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
An autopsy of the pilot was conducted by the Snohomish County Medical Examiner, Snohomish, Washington. The cause of death was “blunt traumatic injuries” and the manner of death was an accident. Postmortem toxicological testing of liver tissue by NMS Labs detected ethanol at 0.95 g/hg, methamphetamine at 16,000 ng/g, and amphetamine at 1500 ng/g; delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC), 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC), and carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (carboxy-delta-9-THC) also were detected. Postmortem toxicological testing by the FAA Forensic Sciences Laboratory detected methamphetamine at 7254 ng/g in liver tissue and at 919 ng/g in muscle tissue, amphetamine at 399 ng/g in liver tissue and at 50 ng/g in muscle tissue, delta-9-THC at 28 ng/g in liver tissue and at 41.8 ng/g in muscle tissue, 11-hydroxy-tetrahydronannabinol (11-hydroxy-THC) 48.5 ng/g in liver tissue and at 3.3 ng/g in muscle tissue, carboxy-delta-9-THC at 30.5 ng/g in liver tissue and at 2 ng/g in muscle tissue, and amitriptyline at 8 ng/g in liver tissue and at 41 ng/g in muscle tissue. Nortriptyline was detected in liver tissue and was detected at 8 ng/g in muscle tissue. Ethanol was not detected in liver tissue or muscle tissue. Blood was not available for testing. Delta-9-THC is the primary psychoactive chemical in cannabis, including marijuana, hashish, and cannabis edibles. Marijuana is a federal Schedule I controlled substance. 11-hydroxy-THC (more specifically, 11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC) and carboxy-delta-9-THC are metabolites of delta-9-THC. Delta-9-THC may be inhaled or ingested recreationally by users seeking mind-altering effects. It may also be used medicinally, such as to treat illness-associated nausea and appetite loss. Psychoactive effects of delta-9-THC vary depending on the user, dose, and route of administration, and may impair motor coordination, reaction time, decision making, problem solving, and vigilance. The instantaneous level of delta-9-THC in a living person’s blood does not directly predict impairing effects, and interpretation of postmortem tissue levels of delta-9-THC is further complicated by the fact that such levels may differ from antemortem blood levels. Ethanol is the intoxicating alcohol in beer, wine, and liquor, and, if consumed, can impair judgment, psychomotor performance, cognition, and vigilance. Alcohol consumption is not the only possible source of ethanol in postmortem specimens. Ethanol sometimes may be produced by microbes in a person’s body tissues after death. Methamphetamine is a central nervous system stimulant drug. Amphetamine is a metabolite of methamphetamine and is also a central nervous system stimulant. Both methamphetamine and amphetamine are available as federal Schedule II controlled substance prescription medications used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, narcolepsy, and occasionally obesity. As medicines, the drugs typically carry warnings that they may impair the ability to engage in potentially hazardous activities. In addition to being used medicinally, methamphetamine and amphetamine are frequently produced illicitly and abused recreationally by ingestion, snorting, smoking, rectal insertion, or injection. Seeking an intense euphoric effect, people who abuse methamphetamine and amphetamine typically use higher doses than are used medicinally. Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant medication that can be used to treat nerve pain, depression, and a variety of other conditions. Nortriptyline is an active metabolite of amitriptyline and is also a prescription medication with similar uses as amitriptyline. Amitriptyline and nortriptyline often carry warnings that they may impair mental and/or physical abilities required for performance of hazardous tasks, such as operating machinery or motor vehicles. The noncertificated pilot was performing taxi tests in his unregistered experimental amateur-built airplane. A witness reported that the airplane departed the runway and flew erratically as it briefly flew away from the airport and then reappeared over a tree line. The video of the accident sequence showed that, as the airplane flew over the airport, it made several uncoordinated turns, rapid pitch changes and erratically yawed right to left multiple times. In the airplane’s final seconds of flight, it began a steep right bank during which the left wing separated and the airplane fell to the ground. Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed that the forward left wing spar failed in overload due to an improper repair that included splicing the spar and rejoining it with a sleeve. The spar failed in flight, which resulted in a failure of the left wing, a subsequent loss of control and rapid descent. The examination did not reveal any other preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Toxicology testing detected the presence of ethanol in one tested liver specimen, and the pilot’s use of methamphetamine, cannabis, and amitriptyline. The ethanol was not detected in two other tested specimens (including another liver tissue specimen), which indicates that it was likely from sources other than alcohol consumption. The measured levels of methamphetamine were high enough to indicate a general likelihood that the pilot was experiencing associated impairing effects at the time of the crash. However, the precise nature and severity of his impairment cannot be determined from available evidence. Whether the pilot’s use of cannabis or amitriptyline would have resulted in impairment could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Wing structure-Spar (on wing)-Failure
- — Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Wing structure-Spar (on wing)-Incorrect service/maintenance
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Repair-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_WPR23FA351.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, loss of control, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Simulation Modeling Requirements for Loss-of-Control Accident Prevention of Turboprop Transport Aircraft
In-flight loss of control remains the leading contributor to aviation accident fatalities, with stall upsets being the leading causal factor. The February 12, 2009.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗