Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / WPR24FA035

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event WPR24FA035

2023-11-14 Provo, Utah, United States Fatal 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N3971L

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

CESSNA 172G

Engine

CONT MOTOR 0-300 SER (145 hp)

Seats / Engines

4 seats · 1 engine

Last airworthiness date

19660114

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A49F50

Registrant of record

KENWORTHY CHRISTIAN R

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack during a chandelle maneuver, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and descent into trees and terrain. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to maneuver into a canyon and rising terrain for unknown reasons and his inadequate performance planning.

Factual narrative

On November 14, 2023, about 1008 mountain standard time, a Cessna 172G, N3971L, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Provo, Utah. The pilot and pilot-rated passenger in the front seat were fatally injured, and the other pilot-rated passenger sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The passenger reported that they were flying from Spanish Fork Municipal Airport/Woodhouse Field (SPK), Spanish Fork, Utah, to Driggs/Reed Memorial Airport (DIJ), Driggs, Idaho, with the intent of building flight hours. He believed that the pilot’s intent was to maneuver to remain outside of the Provo Municipal Airport (PVU) Class D airspace, as well as the Salt Lake City (SLC) Class B airspace. According to ADS-B data, the airplane departed at 1004 and flew north and east of PVU and west of Buckley Mountain into Slate Canyon, toward the rising terrain leading to Corral Mountain, which peaked about 10,100 ft msl and was located about 6 nm south of Highway 189. The passenger further reported that he was unable to hear any dialogue between the pilot and the front-seat passenger regarding the reason for the pilot's decision to fly eastward into the canyon. He also noted windy conditions in the canyon, that he heard the airplane’s stall warning horn after the pilot attempted a right chandelle, and that the plane was in a nose-high attitude before it hit trees. Following a search and rescue mission after the Civil Air Patrol received an emergency locator broadcast, the airplane wreckage was located about 6 miles northeast of SPK on a slope of Slate Canyon, about 2,000 ft below the summit and at an elevation of about 7,900 ft msl. The airplane was oriented on a magnetic heading of 050° when it came to rest on a 35° slope. The first identified point of contact (FIPC) was a severed branch 70 ft up an aspen tree. The debris path was marked with subsequent tree strikes that began about 80 ft forward of the FIPC and oriented on a magnetic heading of 280°. The main wreckage marked the end of the debris path and was located about 170 ft beyond the FIPC. All major airplane components necessary for flight were accounted for at the accident site. Postaccident examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any preimpact malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Flight control cable continuity was established from the cockpit controls to all surfaces. The elevator trim actuator was measured and found to be 5º tab up. The flaps were in the Up position. The fuel selector valve was examined and confirmed to be in the Both position. Compressed air was applied to the fuel lines and no obstructions were observed. The carburetor was removed and examined; no anomalies were noted. Fuel was found in the carburetor bowl and tested for water using water finding paste with a negative result. Mechanical continuity was established throughout the rotating group, valvetrain, and accessory section as the crankshaft was manually rotated at the propeller by hand. Thumb compression was achieved at all four cylinders and the valves displayed normal lift when the crankshaft was rotated. Examination of the cylinders’ combustion chamber interior components using a lighted borescope revealed normal piston face and valve signatures, with no indications of catastrophic engine failure. Performance calculations were completed using an empty of weight of 1,330 lbs, a pilot weight of 140 lbs, a front seat passenger weight of 182 lbs, a rear seat passenger weight of 185 lbs, and a fuel weight of 252 lbs. Based off these values, the airplane’s calculated gross weight at takeoff was 2,079 lbs. According to the POH, at a gross weight of 2,000 lbs, 5,000 ft msl, and 41°F, the maximum rate of climb is 610 ft/min at 66 kts indicated airspeed (IAS). At 10,000 ft msl and 23°F, the maximum climb rate is 380 ft/min at 64 kts (IAS). The last recorded altitude on ADS-B data was around 7,275 ft msl with a ground speed of 90 kts, which was calculated to be approximately 69 IAS. The peak that the airplane had to clear was approximately 10,100 ft msl and 2 nm from the last recorded data point. Figure 1. View of ADS-B overlay on Google Maps depicting aircraft's flight track into mountainous terrain. For the airplane to clear 10,150 ft msl at a maximum climb rate of 610 ft/min, the airplane would need about 5 minutes, covering about 6.5 nm in that time. At a maximum climb rate of 380 ft/min, the airplane would need about 8 minutes, covering about 10 nm. In order to maintain 90-kts groundspeed, the airplane would need a climb rate of about 2,300 ft/min which would clear 10,150 ft msl in about 1.5 minutes, covering about 2 nm. The FAA Airplane Flying Handbook, Chapter 10: Performance Maneuvers, stated that a chandelle is “a maximum performance, 180° climbing turn that begins from approximately straight-and-level flight and concludes with the airplane in a wings-level, nose-high attitude just above stall speed.” It added that a common error when performing chandelles is “stalling at any point during the maneuver.” The fatally injured pilot and front seat pilot-rated passenger's autopsies were performed by a Forensic Pathologist of the Utah County Sheriff's Office, Taylorsville, Utah. According to the autopsy reports, the cause of death for both was blunt force injuries, and their manner of death was accidental. The FAA's Bioaeronautical Sciences Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, performed toxicological tests on specimens recovered from the pilot and pilot-rated passenger. Their specimens tested negative for ethanol and any substances of abuse. The commercial pilot and two pilot-rated passengers were on a cross-country flight to build flight hours. According to the surviving passenger, he believed that the pilot’s intent was to maneuver to remain outside of the Provo Municipal Airport Class D airspace, as well as the Salt Lake City Class B airspace, directly to Driggs, Idaho. Shortly after departure, the pilot maneuvered the airplane to the north, just west of Buckley Mountain in Provo, Utah, and into a canyon with rising terrain leading to Corral Mountain, which peaked at 10,100 ft mean sea level (msl). The passenger also stated that he was unable to hear any conversation between the pilot and pilot-rated passenger in the front seat, nor did he hear why the pilot chose to fly into the canyon. He also reported windy conditions in the canyon, hearing the airplane's stall warning sound after the pilot attempted a tight, right 180° turn, and seeing the airplane in a nose-high attitude before hitting trees and terrain. The airplane’s wings and fuselage were substantially damaged. Postaccident examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any preimpact malfunction or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Mechanical continuity was established throughout the rotating group, valvetrain, and accessory section as the crankshaft was manually rotated at the propeller by hand. Fuel flow and flight control continuity were confirmed. Performance calculations showed that the pilot’s inadequate performance planning contributed to the accident. According to the Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH), at 5,000 msl and 41° F, the airplane’s maximum climb capability was 610 ft/min at 66 kts indicated airspeed (IAS), requiring 6.5 nm to clear the advancing mountain peak. At 10,000 ft msl and 23°F, the maximum climb rate was 380 ft/min at 64 kts IAS, requiring 10 nm to clear the peak. According to the airplane’s last track data point, it would have had to climb about 3,000 ft in 2 nm to clear the advancing peak. The track data suggests they were likely climbing at approximately 610 ft/min when the pilot decided to turn the airplane around. The surviving passenger’s statement showed that the pilot likely determined they would not clear the 10,100 ft peak and then attempted a chandelle maneuver to turn the airplane around while attempting to climb. The passenger recalled hearing the stall warning horn while the airplane was in a nose high attitude before they impacted trees. This suggests the pilot likely failed to maintain airspeed during the maneuver, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall. The steep impact angle indicated by the debris field suggests the airplane then descended into trees and terrain. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
  • Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Effect on equipment
  • Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Performance calculations-Pilot

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2023_WPR24FA035.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, engine failure). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗