NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR24FA291
Registry · N23BD
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
AMERICAN CHAMPION AIRCRAFT 8GCBC
Year of manufacture
2009 · 15 years old at event
TCDS
A21CE · AMERICAN CHAMPION AIRCRAFT CORP
Engine
LYCOMING O-360-C1G (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
3 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20090910
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A20644
Registrant of record
COX MIKE TRUSTEE
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s decision to continue the flight over rising terrain at a low altitude in a high-elevation, high-density-altitude environment.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn September 1, 2024, about 1045 mountain daylight time, an American Champion Aircraft 8GCBC, N23BD, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Meeteetse, Wyoming. The pilot sustained serious injuries, and the passenger was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. A family member of the passenger reported that the intent of the flight was to spread the ashes of a recently deceased family member over the Shoshone National Forest. On the day of the accident flight, the pilot and passenger met at Yellowstone Regional Airport (COD), Cody, Wyoming, to overfly the national forest. The family member added that she observed the airplane overfly her location in the national forest, circle, and then depart to the west. The pilot reported that the intent of the flight was to depart to a predetermined GPS location, locate the passenger’s relatives on the ground, and spread the ashes. After arriving at the GPS location, they observed the family members on the ground, circled, and spread the ashes. After releasing the ashes, the pilot leveled the airplane and applied engine power. He stated that the airplane “reached an altitude where it could not climb” and that the airspeed was near stall speed. He did not recall the airplane’s altitude at the time it stopped climbing, and reported that due to his injuries, he did not recall any of the subsequent events of the flight. Two hunters, one of whom was a rated pilot, were hunting in the area of the accident. The pilot-rated witness said that he did not see the accident sequence, but heard a sputtering engine followed by the sound of an airplane impacting terrain with a “loud bang.” Black smoke was observed emanating from a group of trees about 3/4 mile from their location. Recorded ADS-B flight track data showed that the airplane departed COD and flew in a southerly direction toward the Shoshone National Forest. The data depicted a series of heading and altitude changes consistent with the family member’s statement. The ADS-B data showed that, at 1041:18, the airplane was on a northeasterly heading at an altitude about 8,625 ft mean sea level (msl) with a groundspeed of 102 knots (kts). About 33 seconds later, the airplane made a left turn to a southwest heading and descended to an altitude about 8,550 ft msl. The airplane’s ground speed at this point was 113 kts. The airplane continued on a southwesterly heading toward an area of rising terrain and climbed to an altitude about 9,625 ft msl until flight track data ended about ½ mile northeast of the accident site, as shown in figure 1 below. The last two data points showed decreasing ground speed as the airplane climbed, with the last recorded ground speed at 63 kts. Figure 1: View of airplane flight track. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe pilot reported that the airplane’s gross weight at the time of the accident was 1,960 lbs. According to the airplane’s flight manual, the service ceiling for the airplane was 14,500 ft and the maximum gross weight was 2150 lbs. The Pilot’s Operating Manual for the airplane indicated an approximate climb performance of 679 to 549 feet per minute (fpm) at a pressure altitude range between 8,000 ft and 11,000 feet. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe National Weather Service (NWS) Surface Analysis Chart valid at the time of the accident depicted high-pressure systems over western Wyoming and a stationary front extending southeastward across Montana into central Wyoming. The station models depicted light wind over the area and clear skies. High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) numerical model data was obtained from the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory archive for 1100 over the closest grid point to the accident site. The sounding vertical wind profile showed wind from the southwest with little variation in direction with height, with the winds increasing to 15 knots about 12,000 ft. No strong vertical wind shear was noted. The density altitude was 11,600 ft. Given the low relative humidity in the area of the accident site, conditions were not conducive to the development of carburetor icing. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe pilot reported that the airplane’s gross weight at the time of the accident was 1,960 lbs. According to the airplane’s flight manual, the service ceiling for the airplane was 14,500 ft and the maximum gross weight was 2150 lbs. The Pilot’s Operating Manual for the airplane indicated an approximate climb performance of 679 to 549 feet per minute (fpm) at a pressure altitude range between 8,000 ft and 11,000 feet. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe airplane impacted mountainous terrain along the southern edge of a valley about 37 miles southwest of COD. The first identified point of contact was a 150- to 175-ft-tall tree that exhibited damaged limbs near its top. The debris path was oriented on a heading of about 210° magnetic and was about 200 ft in length from the initial tree impact to the main wreckage. Various portions of airplane’s flight control surfaces and propeller fragments, as well as damaged trees, were observed throughout the debris path. Postaccident examination of the airplane was limited due to impact damage and post-crash fire. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the fuselage came to rest upright on a heading of about 240° magnetic at an elevation of 9,850 ft msl. The instrument panel exhibited thermal and impact damage. The flight controls were only observed in the forward seat station. The forward flight control was fracture-separated at the torque tube attachment point. The airplane’s fuel system was mostly destroyed by post-impact fire. Aluminum pooling and remnants of the wing fuel tanks were observed throughout the left and right wing areas. The engine remained attached to the engine mount and fuselage and exhibited thermal damage. Thermal and impact damage was observed on both left and right ignition harnesses. Both magnetos were mostly destroyed and thermally damaged. The carburetor was separated from the intake plenum and was consumed by thermal damage. The accessory case was partially consumed by fire. The crankcase was disassembled, and the engine crankshaft and camshaft were removed. A slight bend was observed on the crankshaft about mid span, consistent with impact damage. No scoring was observed on the crankcase journals or bearings. The connecting rods remained attached to the crankshaft, were void of lubrication, and rotated with slight resistance, consistent with postaccident fire. The engine-driven oil pump was present but thermally damaged and could not be removed from the accessory case, consistent with post-accident fire damage. TESTS AND RESEARCHThe forward flight control was sent to National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, for examination. The examination of the fracture surface revealed signs of melting and solidification, consistent with exposure to high temperatures for an extended time. All fracture surfaces examined showed evidence of melting and solidification. The pilot reported that the purpose of the flight was to fly to a predetermined location in a nearby national forest, locate the passenger’s relatives on the ground, and spread the ashes of the passenger’s recently deceased family member. After arriving at the location, they observed the family members on the ground, circled, and spread the ashes. After releasing the ashes, the pilot leveled the airplane and applied engine power. He stated that the airplane “reached an altitude where it could not climb” and that the airspeed was near stall speed. He did not recall the airplane’s altitude at the time it stopped climbing, and reported that due to his injuries, he did not recall any of the subsequent events of the flight. ADS-B flight track data showed that the airplane departed the airport and flew in a southerly direction toward the national forest. The data depicted a series of heading and altitude changes that were consistent with the family member’s statement. The airplane then departed to the southwest along a valley toward an area of rising terrain. The airplane began to climb from about 8,550 ft mean sea level (msl) with a corresponding decrease in groundspeed until flight track data ended in the vicinity of the accident site. The airplane’s last recorded altitude and groundspeed was 9,625 ft msl and 63 knots, respectively. A pilot-rated witness did not observe the accident sequence, but did hear a sputtering engine followed by the sound of the accident airplane impacting terrain with a “loud bang.” He then observed black smoke emanating from a group of trees about 3/4 mile from his location. The airplane impacted mountainous terrain along the southern edge of a valley at an elevation of 9,850 ft mean sea level. All major structural components of the airplane were located near the main wreckage. The airplane was mostly consumed by post impact fire. The engine remained attached to the engine mount and fuselage. Thermal damage was observed throughout the engine from post impact fire. Disassembly of the engine revealed a slight bend on the crank shaft about mid span, consistent with impact damage. Even though the witness report of a sputtering engine could not be corroborated due to the extensive thermal damage from the post-crash fire, ADS-B data indicated that the airplane continued to climb until the collision with rising terrain. Although the airplane’s climb performance could not be assessed, the airplane’s controlled flight into terrain was consistent with the pilot’s decision to continue the flight with the airplane approaching its maximum gross weight at a low altitude in a high-elevation, high-density-altitude environment. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_WPR24FA291.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, wind shear, stall, controlled flight into terrain). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Optimal recovery from microburst wind shear
The flight path of a twin-jet transport aircraft is optimized in a microburst encounter during approach to landing. The objective is to execute an escape maneuver that maintains safe ground clearance …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other
[Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗