NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ANC14LA034
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, which necessitated a forced landing on unsuitable terrain, during which the airplane flipped over and became partially submerged in water.
Factual narrative
On June 1, 2014, about 1315 Alaska daylight time, a Cessna 182K airplane, N2631R, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Galena, Alaska. The pilot and one passenger sustained minor injuries, and two passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 flight. The pilot reported that the purpose of the flight was to pick up three employees from two remote locations to transport them to Fairbanks, Alaska, so they could attend a training class. After departing Fairbanks International Airport (FAI), Fairbanks, he flew to the two locations and picked up the three employees uneventfully. The flight then departed Kaltag, Alaska, destined for Edward G. Pitka Sr. Airport (GAL), Galena, Alaska, for a planned fuel stop before returning to FAI. The pilot reported that, as the airplane approached GAL and while flying level at 1,500 ft mean sea level, the engine began to run roughly and lose power. The pilot applied carburetor heat, but it had no effect. He then confirmed that the fuel selector was set to both and saw that the fuel totalizer indicated that about 22.8 gallons of fuel were remaining. However, both fuel gauges were indicating near empty with little or no movement of the needles. Shortly thereafter, the engine lost all power, so he chose to conduct a forced landing on a lake shoreline, during which the airplane flipped over, became partially submerged in water, and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. The wreckage was recovered about 1.5 months after the accident. Examination of the wing fuel bladders revealed that at least five bladder fastening snaps in the left wing and three snaps in the right wing were unfastened; however, it could not be determined if the bladder fastening snaps became unfastened before or during the accident or during the wreckage recovery. Examination of the airplane revealed no other evidence of any mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. According to the Federal Aviation Administration carburetor icing probability chart, the temperature and dew point when the engine lost power, were conducive to the accumulation of serious icing at cruise power settings. The pilot was conducting a cross-country flight to pick up and transport employees to a training class. After picking up all the employees, the pilot planned to make a fuel stop before continuing to the destination. The pilot reported that, as the airplane approached the airport and while flying level at 1,500 ft mean sea level, the engine began to run roughly and lose power. The pilot applied carburetor heat, but it had no effect. He then confirmed that the fuel selector was set to both and saw that the fuel totalizer indicated that about 22.8 gallons of fuel were remaining but that both fuel gauges were indicating near empty with little or no movement of the needles. Shortly thereafter, the engine lost all power, so the pilot chose to conduct a forced landing on a lake shoreline, during which the airplane flipped over, became partially submerged in water, and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed that at least five bladder fastening snaps in the left wing and three snaps in the right wing were unfastened; however, it could not be determined when the fuel bladder fasteners became unfastened; thus, it could not be determined if the bladder fastening snaps being unfastened led to the loss of engine power. Examination of the airplane revealed no other evidence of any mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The atmospheric conditions that existed when the engine lost power were conducive to serious carburetor icing at cruise power settings. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_ANC14LA034.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗