NTSB CAROL · Event
Event FTW00LA148
Registry · N2440L
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 172H
Year of manufacture
1966 · 34 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR 0-300 SER (145 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19661223
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A2413E
Registrant of record
EADS KEVIN C
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the student pilot during the landing.
Factual narrative
On May 13, 2000, at 1030 central daylight time, a Cessna 172H single-engine airplane, N2440L, was substantially damaged during a touch and go landing at the Mesquite Metro Airport near Mesquite, Texas. The certificated flight instructor and the student pilot were not injured. The airplane was owned by Superior Software Solutions, Inc., of Plano, Texas, and operated by the North Texas Flying Club of Plano, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight, and a flight plan was not filed. The local flight departed from the McKinney Airport, McKinney, Texas, approximately 0920. According to the flight instructor and student pilot, the wind conditions on departure at McKinney Municipal Airport were "light and variable." The student pilot was executing touch-and-go landings on runway 35 at the Mesquite Metro Airport. During these landings, the wind increased, with occasional gusts up to 15 knots. During the accident touch-and-go landing, the student pilot "landed a bit hard, and the airplane bounced." The flight instructor took over the controls of the airplane and applied full power; however, "there was not enough airspeed to stop the sink rate." The airplane touched down again and "hit hard on the left main gear, then on the nose wheel." The flight instructor executed a go-around, continued the flight to McKinney Municipal Airport and landed without further incident. The flight instructor and student pilot conducted a post flight examination, particularly of the nose wheel, strut, and shimmy damper, and no damage was noted at that time. However, on May 15, 2000, a different flight instructor reported the airplane's firewall was damaged. An FAA inspector examined the airplane and verified that the firewall was structurally damaged. At 0953, the weather at Dallas Love Field, Dallas, Texas, (approximately 33 nautical miles northwest of the accident site) was reported as wind from 020 degrees at 10 knots, visibility 10 statue miles, sky clear, temperature 72 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 43 degrees Fahrenheit, and altimeter setting 30.18 inches of mercury. During one of a series of touch-and-go landings, the student pilot 'landed a bit hard,' the airplane bounced and the flight instructor applied full power. However, 'there was not enough airspeed to stop the sink rate.' The airplane touched down again and 'hit hard on the left main gear, then on the nose wheel.' The flight instructor executed a go-around and continued the flight to the departure airport where he landed the airplane without further incident. The firewall was structurally damaged. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_FTW00LA148.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗