LAX00LA065
1999-12-30 · FALLBROOK, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport L18
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's misjudged altitude and distance during a night landing approach, which resulted in an undershoot.
Factual narrative
On December 30, 1999, about 1820 hours Pacific standard time, a Piper PA-32-300, N1412T, sustained substantial damage when it touched down short of the runway while landing at Fallbrook, California. The owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The private pilot and two passengers were not injured. The personal cross-country flight departed Corvalis, Oregon, at an unknown time, and made a stop for fuel in Sacramento, California, prior to continuing to the intended destination of Oceanside, California. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The pilot reported to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector that he obtained the Oceanside weather via the ASOS and realized the weather was marginal. He flew over the Oceanside VOR and proceeded outbound on the 096-degree radial. He said clouds were below him and he could not always see the ground. As he began his base leg for runway 24, he lost sight of the airport, pulled up, and initiated a go-around. He contacted the Palomar Airport Air Traffic Control Tower and obtained their ATIS. Palomar was 700 feet overcast so he decided to divert to French Valley, California, about 30 miles away. As he turned north toward French Valley, he noticed the lights of the city of Fallbrook, California, and tuned into the airport's common traffic advisory frequency. A Cessna was in the traffic pattern and told this pilot there was no problem seeing the runway. The pilot entered the Fallbrook landing pattern and flew the visual approach for runway 18. He turned final, noted he was on the VASI (visual approach slope indicator), and completed the before landing checklist. He then noticed the VASI lights were red. He added full power and pulled up, but struck the ground about 20 feet short of the runway, separating the landing gear from the airplane. The pilot stated to FAA inspectors that he misjudged the approach. The pilot intended to land at Oceanside, but diverted to Fallbrook, California, because of the weather. As the pilot turned onto the final approach course, he noted that the airplane was on the VASI (visual approach slope indicator) directed glide path, and completed the before landing checklist. He then noticed the VASI lights were red, indicating the airplane was below the proper glide path. He added full power and pulled up, then struck the ground about 20 feet short of the runway, separating the landing gear from the airplane. The pilot stated to FAA inspectors that he had misjudged the visual approach. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_LAX00LA065.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…