NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA99FA031
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning/decision which led to fuel exhaustion.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On November 7, 1998, about 1708 eastern standard time, a Piper PA-28-151, N44240, registered to P & N Corporation, collided with trees and an apartment building during an emergency descent for a forced landing near the Lovell Field, Chattanooga, Tennessee. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged and the private-rated pilot, and one passenger sustained minor injuries. One passenger was not injured. The flight originated at 1349 central standard time, from the Evansville Regional Airport, Evansville, Indiana. The pilot stated that the initial departure point was Marion, Iowa, and before departure of the planned 2 leg cross-country flight of 593 statute miles, he did not receive a preflight weather briefing and as a result, he did not obtain the winds aloft for the flight, but he did determine the distances, headings, and an estimated time en route. He used the indicated air speed as ground speed and did not calculate the true air speed. Additionally, he did not perform fuel consumption calculations. Review of the flight planning paperwork provided by the pilot revealed that the estimated time en route for the first leg was 3.2 hours. The flight departed Marion at approximately 1000 central standard time with the fuel level in each fuel tank 1-1.5 inches below the fuel cap, and landed uneventfully at 1311, as documented by Air Traffic Control (ATC). No fuel was purchased while at Evansville; the fuel gauges were indicating 12 gallons each, and the hour meter difference from takeoff to landing was recorded to be 3.5 hours. The flight departed VFR on a heading of 145 degrees and while flying at 3,500 feet, he reported that he was unable to obtain VOR reception from the Bowling Green VORTAC which was located 97 statute miles from the departure airport. The flight continued, arrived over the Bowling Green VORTAC, then proceeded on a heading towards the Lovell Field Airport, Chatanooga, Tennessee. When the flight was approximately 20 miles away from his destination airport, at 1653 eastern standard time as determined by ATC, he contacted Chatanooga Approach and advised that the flight was inbound for landing. The flight continued and after clearing Signal mountain, he reduced power to idle to descend to traffic pattern altitude. At 1,400 feet msl, he applied power to level off but the engine quit. At that time the fuel gauges indicated 2-3 gallons of fuel remaining per tank. He attempted to restart the engine but was unable and at 1806.24, he declared an emergency and advised the controller that he "...lost the engine." While descending for the forced landing, the propeller stopped. He maneuvered the airplane for a forced landing, extended 10 degrees of flaps, and while descending on a heading of 360 degrees, the left wing of the airplane collided with a tree approximately 24 feet above ground level. The airplane continued and 21 feet later, the right wing collided with a tree at the same height. The airplane then rotated to the right about 100 degrees, collided with the side of an apartment building near the ground, and came to rest on a magnetic heading of 108 degrees adjacent to the building with both wings separated.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
Information pertaining to the pilot is contained on page 2 of the Factual Report-Aviation.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
According to the airplane type certificate data sheet, the usable fuel quantity is 48 gallons, and the unusable fuel quantity is 2 gallons.
COMMUNICATIONS
The pilot was in contact with Chattanooga Air Traffic Control Tower. A transcript of communications is an attachment to this report.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
Examination of the accident site revealed no evidence of fuel leakage from the separated wings. Approximately 1/2 ounce of fuel was drained from the right wing fuel tank. The airplane was recovered to Lovell Field Airport for further examination which revealed a total of 4 ounces of fuel drained from the carburetor bowl and from the gascolator. No fuel was found in the fuel line from the engine driven fuel pump to the carburetor or in the fuel line from the auxiliary fuel pump to the engine driven fuel pump. Examination of the engine revealed crankshaft, camshaft, and valve train continuity. Both magnetos were tightly installed and both sparked when rotated by hand.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Toxicology screen of specimens of the pilot performed at the hospital of admittance was negative for tested drugs.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The airplane had been operated for 5.9 hours as determined by the hour meter since departure on the initial flight. The pilot further stated that during the entire flight time, the mixture control remained in the "full rich" position. Review of the cruise performance charts regarding range and true airspeed revealed they are predicated with having the mixture leaned per Lycoming instructions. According to FAA personnel, on the day of the accident there was no report of a failure or malfunction of the Bowling Green VOR. Additionally, fuel consumption calculations were performed by FAA personnel using the route of flight described by the pilot and the altitudes flown, winds aloft data obtained for the route of flight, and performance charts for the airplane. The calculations revealed 47.79 gallons of fuel consumed for the flight. The wreckage was released to Mr. R.B. "Rusty" Romito of Chattanooga Aero Service, Inc., on November 8, 1998. No components were retained. The pilot did not obtain a preflight weather briefing or determine the true airspeed for the 593 statute mile 2 leg cross country flight; he assumed indicated airspeed was the ground speed. The flight departed on the first leg with fuel tanks slightly less than full and arrived uneventfully 3.5 hours later. Fuel was not purchased and the flight departed on the second leg. While near the destination airport, the engine quit due to fuel exhaustion. At that time the fuel gauges each indicated approximately 2-3 gallons remaining. While descending for the forced landing, the airplane collided with trees then the ground. Examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of fuel leakage in flight. Approximately 4 ounces of fuel were drained from the carburetor and from the gascolator. Fuel lines in the engine compartment were empty. Approximately 1/2 ounce of fuel was drained from the right wing fuel tank. No engine failure or malfunction noted. The pilot further stated that during the entire flight time, the mixture control was in the full rich position. Fuel consumption calculations performed for the flight by FAA personnel revealed 47.79 gallons of fuel used out of a total of 48 gallons of usable fuel. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_MIA99FA031.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel exhaustion, engine failure). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Multi-level Adaptation for Automatic Landing with Engine Failure under Turbulent Weather
This paper addresses efficient feasibility evaluation of possible emergency landing sites, online navigation, and path following for automatic landing under engine-out failure subject to turbulent wea…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗