NTSB CAROL · Event
Event SEA05LA194
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper preflight planning/preparation during takeoff. A factor was the windshear.
Factual narrative
On September 15, 2005, approximately 1545 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 182P single-engine airplane, N58717, sustained substantial damage following an aborted takeoff from the Johnson Creek Airport, near Yellow Pine, Idaho. The certificated private pilot and his three passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal cross-country flight, and a flight plan was not filed. The flight was originating at the time of the accident, with its destination being Idaho Falls, Idaho. In a telephone conversation with the NTSB investigator-in-charge, and according to the Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2), the pilot reported that after taxiing to Runway 17 and completing an engine run up, he contacted the pilot of the airplane who had just departed to the south. The departing pilot radioed, "...you should be able to make it. It wasn't too bad." The pilot stated that after lifting off and during the climbout to the south he encountered a windshear condition, a headwind that changed to a 20 knot tailwind at treetop level. The pilot further stated that at an altitude of approximately 60 to 80 feet above ground level, and with rising terrain approaching, he decided to abort the takeoff abruptly by retarding the throttle to the idle position. The aircraft impacted the ground "very hard", causing both main wheels to separate from the landing gear, the nose gear folding back into the firewall, and the engine separating from the top two engine mounts. There was no postcrash fire and all occupants exited the airplane without injury. The pilot reported no anomalies existed with the airplane or engine prior to the takeoff, and that prior to departure the wind was from 170 degrees at 10 knots, gusting to 30 knots. The pilot stated that he should have waited 1 to 2 hours before taking off, for cooler temperatures and calmer winds. The pilot further stated that he had operated into and out of the airstrip at least 3 times in the two weeks prior to the accident, however, had never previously taken off on Runway 17, At 1550, the weather reporting facility at the McCall Municipal Airport, McCall, Idaho, located approximately 30 nautical miles west of the accident site, reported wind 190 degrees at 14 knots, visibility 10 statute miles, sky clear, temperature 21 degrees C, dew point -01 degree C, and an altimeter reading of 30.01 inches of Mercury. The density altitude at the time of takeoff was calculated to be 6,740 feet. Under the "REMARKS" section for the Johnson Creek Airport, located in the United States Department of Transportation's Airport/Facility Directory, it is noted: "Recommend land Runway 17, takeoff Runway 35 when wind conditions allow. Runway 17-35 plus 60' trees 100' each side of centerline. Additional 250' available for takeoff on Runway 35 end. Special considerations should be given to density altitude, turbulence, and mountain flying proficiency. After getting confirmation from the pilot who took off before him that the wind wasn't that bad, the pilot departed on Runway 17. During the initial climbout the pilot encountered a windshear condition, as the headwind changed to a 20 knot tailwind. Approaching rising terrain and at an altitude of approximately 60 to 80 feet above the ground and not climbing, the pilot elected to abort the takeoff. After retarding the throttle to idle the airplane subsequently impacted the ground "very hard", causing both wheels to separate from both main landing gear, the nose gear folding back into the firewall, and the top two engine mounts separating. There was no postcrash fire and all occupants exited the airplane without injury. The pilot indicated there were no anomalies with the airplane prior to or during the departure, and that the wind at the time of departure was from 170 degree at 10 knots, gusting to 30 knots. The pilot stated that he felt he should have delayed his takeoff for 1 to 2 hours, as cooler temperatures and calmer winds might have prevailed. It was also noted that although the pilot had recently operated into and out of the airstrip, this was the first time he had attempted taking off on Runway 17. The Airport/Facility Directory cautions against taking off on Runway 17, paying particular attention to density altitude, turbulence, and mountain flying proficiency. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_SEA05LA194.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Explainable LiDAR 3D Point Cloud Segmentation and Clustering for Detecting Airplane-Generated Wind Turbulence
Wake vortices - strong, coherent air turbulences created by aircraft - pose a significant risk to aviation safety and therefore require accurate and reliable detection methods.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Does small-scale turbulence matter for ice growth in mixed-phase clouds?
Representing the glaciation of mixed-phase clouds in terms of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is a challenge for many weather and climate models, which tend to overestimate this process because…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Effects of electrostatic interaction on clustering and collision of bidispersed inertial particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence
In sandstorms and thunderclouds, turbulence-induced collisions between solid particles and ice crystals lead to inevitable triboelectrification.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2023 · SKYbrary article
Wake Vortex Turbulence — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary wake vortex turbulence comprehensive article — generation mechanics, dissipation factors, separation standards (ICAO LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY/SUPER + recategorisation RECAT-EU).
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗