WPR11LA313

Factual narrative

On June 26, 2011, about 0930 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-46-350P, N9246M, sustained substantial damage when the nose wheel landing gear collapsed during landing roll at the Flagstaff Pulliam Airport (FLG), Flagstaff, Arizona. The airplane was registered to N9246M LLC, Las Vegas, Nevada, and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The airline transport rated pilot and two passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight. The cross-country flight originated from Las Vegas, Nevada, about 0810 with an intended destination of FLG. In a written statement to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge, the pilot reported that following a normal landing on runway 21, the nose began to lower. As the nose wheel landing gear touched the runway surface, the airplane suddenly swerved to the left. Despite her control inputs, the airplane exited the left side of the runway, and the nose wheel landing gear collapsed. Subsequently, the airplane came to rest nose low about 150 feet left of the runway surface. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the engine firewall was bent. Further examination of the nose gear revealed that the attachment components between the nose landing gear actuator and the engine mount were fractured. The engine mount assembly was sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, for further examination. An NTSB metallurgist reported that the engine mount was of a welded tubular construction. The aft end of the nose landing gear actuator was bolted between two attachment feet (left and right) at the aft end of the engine mount structure. Each attachment foot was painted black, machined from a single solid piece, and welded to three support tubes. The right attachment foot was fractured in the circumferential direction inboard of the support tubes. A longitudinal fracture that extended from the circumferential fracture to the outboard end of the attachment foot was also observed. The right attachment foot was cut from the rest of the engine mount so that the fractures could be examined using an optical microscope. The longitudinal fracture was inclined at 45 degrees to the inner and outer surfaces of the tube, consistent with a ductile overstress fracture. The circumferential fracture, viewed looking generally outboard along the attachment foot, exhibited multiple cracks with smooth features and curved crack arrest marks, consistent with fatigue. The largest of these cracks initiated at the “T-shaped” intersection of two of the support tube welds. The fatigue cracks then continued to propagate along the toe of the weld that joins the forward support tubes to the attachment foot. A factual report describing the detailed examination of the engine mount components is available in the public docket. Service Bulletin / Engine Mount Design Information: Piper Aircraft Inc. Service Bulletin 1103D mandates an inspection of the left and right attachment feet for PA-46-350P Mirage serial numbers between 4622001 and 4622200 as follows: “Upon reaching 290 hours time in service on the currently installed engine mount, initial inspection to coincide with the next regularly scheduled maintenance event. Thereafter, compliance to be accomplished on a recurring basis, at a frequency interval not to exceed one hundred (100) hours time in service.” As part of the inspection procedure, the paint is removed prior to fluorescent penetrant inspection. After inspection, the area where the paint was removed is to be coated with a corrosion prevention compound consisting of a layer of Dinitrol/Ardrox AV8 and a layer of Dinitrol/Ardrox AV30. If a crack is found during the inspection, a new engine mount, part number 89137-042, is to be installed. However, the service bulletin notes that installing a new engine mount does not relieve the recurring inspection requirement. Beginning in April 2002, Piper issued a series of mandatory Service Bulletins (SB 1103, with subsequent revisions A, B, C and D) for PA-46-350P models, requiring inspections for cracks in the engine mounts in the areas of the nose landing gear actuator attachment feet. Inspections were to take place at the next regularly scheduled maintenance event, and at each 100 hours time in service or annual inspection, whichever occurred first. Review of supplied copies of airframe and engine logbooks, which were from July 20, 2007 (airframe total time of 1,965 hours) through November 4, 2010 (airframe total time of 2,237.6 hours), revealed no entries that pertained to compliance with SB1103 revisions A, B, C, or D. After touchdown, the airplane veered to the left when the nose gear was lowered to the runway. The pilot attempted to maintain directional control; however, the airplane continued to veer to the left and departed the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed that the nose landing gear had collapsed, and the engine mount was fractured at one of the two attachment feet for the nose landing gear actuator. Metallurgical examination of the fractured attachment foot revealed that it had failed as a result of fatigue cracking that initiated at the intersection of two welds that joined two of the engine mount’s support tubes to the right attachment foot. The fatigue cracking progressed along the toe of the weld that joined the forward support tube to the attachment foot. The location of the fatigue fracture was consistent with bending loads caused by a force directed aft by the nose gear actuator. About 9 years prior to the accident, the airframe manufacturer issued a service bulletin requiring an inspection of the engine mount attachment feet at the first regularly scheduled maintenance event after the engine mount reached 290 hours time-in-service and thereafter every 100 hours. If cracks were observed, a new engine mount must be installed. The service bulletin also states that, despite the replacement of the engine mount, the inspections should continue. As part of the inspection procedure, the paint is removed from and around the attachment feet. After the inspection is complete, the area is covered with a corrosion prevention compound. The airframe manufacturer considers performance of the service bulletin mandatory. On April 8, 2010, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued Safety Recommendation A-10-44, which asked the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to require repetitive inspections of the engine mount feet. On December 22, 2011, based on the FAA’s response that the safety risk is not sufficient to warrant issuance of an airworthiness directive to require the repetitive inspections, the NTSB classified the recommendation Closed-Unacceptable Action. Review of the airframe maintenance records indicated the airplane’s total time at its most recent inspection was about 2,238 hours, and no entries were found indicating replacement of the engine mount or compliance with the manufacturer’s issued service bulletin. Additionally, paint was observed on and around the attachment feet, which indicates that the inspection had never been performed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.

• C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Failure - C
• F Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Scheduled/routine inspection-Not specified - F
• C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-Mounts-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C