NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX98LA250
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power due to a partially closed fuel shutoff valve as a result of improper maintenance installation.
Factual narrative
On July 29, 1998, at 1210 hours Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 177, N177JH, experienced a partial loss of engine power in the takeoff initial climb and collided with trees during the subsequent forced landing at the Corona, California, airport. The aircraft sustained substantial damage. The commercial pilot and passenger, the sole occupants, suffered minor injuries. The personal flight was originating at the time of the accident and no flight plan was filed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The pilot reported that during the first takeoff attempt a rough running engine necessitated an aborted takeoff. He performed a subsequent run-up and determined that the engine seemed normal and returned to the runway for another takeoff. After liftoff, the engine began to lose rpm and the aircraft had difficulty gaining altitude. About 100 feet agl, the pilot initiated a left turn toward a grassy area that parallels runway 25. The aircraft collided with the trees and came to rest upright on the ground. Both wings were damaged and the landing gear was folded back. The Safety Board conducted an examination of the airframe and powerplant on August 6, 1998. The engine remained attached to the airframe by the engine mount. The fixed-pitch propeller remained attached to the crankshaft and had been straightened to facilitate an engine run-up. The engine driven fuel pump had sustained damage that detached the fuel line on the inlet side of the pump. The two magnetos were secured at their respective mounting pads. Engine control continuity was established to the cockpit controls. The air filter and inlet were free of debris. The fuel system consists of a vented tank in each wing, a three position selector valve (left, right, and both, with no "off" position), a separate fuel shutoff valve, a fuel strainer, an engine driven fuel pump, an electric fuel pump, a manual primer, and a carburetor. The fuel selector was placed in the left tank position and the auxiliary pump was turned on, with a subsequent fuel pressure indication on the cockpit-mounted pressure gauge. The engine was started and was advanced to 2,000 rpm, where a magneto check resulted in a smooth drop of 175 rpm on both magnetos with no abnormal sounds noted. The engine rpm was then advanced to full throttle. After approximately 30 seconds, the rpm began to falter and the engine began to run rough, at which time the fuel pressure on the cockpit-mounted pressure gauge was noted at or near the low scale indication. The throttle was retarded and the engine was shut down with the mixture control. A knob at the pilot's right knee, just below the instrument panel controls the fuel shutoff valve. According to Cessna Aircraft, this knob is normally safety wired in the open position, and is only to be used during emergency situations requiring fuel shutoff or during maintenance of the fuel system. The knob actuates a shutoff valve mounted at the firewall near the floor. Visual examination of the valve follower arm disclosed that it was in a partially closed position with the control knob in the full open position. Further examination revealed that the cable housing was loose in it's associated securing clamp. The cable housing was able to slide back and forth in the clamp. The valve could be hand actuated from the on to off positions without any significant movement of the control knob. The hardware securing the subject clamp utilized a locking-type AN nut that appeared to have about two threads visible. The nut and bolt were tightened about four full turns to secure the cable. The locking action of the subject nut felt normal and was adequate to maintain security after tightening. The cable was then secured in the clamp so that the actuation of the control knob operated the fuel shutoff valve normally from the "on" to the "off" positions. With the fuel shutoff valve properly configured and in the full "on" position, another engine run-up was conducted. The engine was operated with the auxiliary fuel pump "on" at full throttle with an indicated 2,400 rpm for about 1 minute. The fuel pressure remained in the green. The auxiliary fuel pump was turned off to ascertain whether the engine would maintain full power using gravity-fed fuel. The engine operated normally with no abnormal sounds or indications. According to the aircraft maintenance records, AD 70-24-04 Fuel Shut-off Valve, effective December 8, 1970, was complied with on August 18, 1984, by installation of Cessna Kit No. SK177-10. A copy of the AD is appended to this file. The AD lists Cessna Service Letter SE70-24 as the document to reference when installing the kit. SE70-24 states that "it should be noted that the fuel shut-off knob is safetied in the 'on' position during all normal operations." Furthermore, the installation instructions encompassed in SE70-24 require that the knob be safety wired with .018 mild steel wire at the completion of the kit installation. No safety wire was in place and no hole was drilled in the subject knob to accommodate the wire. The pilot reported that he had flown Cessna Cardinals quite a lot in the past. He stated that he was familiar with the fuel system; however, when asked to point to the fuel shutoff valve, he pointed to the fuel selector valve. Subsequent questioning disclosed that he was unaware that the accident aircraft had a separate fuel shutoff valve. The Cessna Operating Checklist for the Cardinal directs the pilot to check the fuel shutoff valve knob before starting the engine, and to check that it is safety wired to the "on" position. The pilot aborted the first takeoff due to a rough running engine. He performed a run-up, determined that the engine seemed normal, and returned for another takeoff. After liftoff, the engine began to lose rpm and the pilot had difficulty gaining altitude. About 100 feet agl, he turned toward a grassy area parallel to the runway. The aircraft collided with the trees and came to rest upright on the ground. The Safety Board conducted a run-up of the engine. No abnormal sounds were noted at 2,000 rpm, but at full throttle, the engine began to run rough and the fuel pressure gauge was at or near the low scale indication. The aircraft has a separate fuel shutoff valve independent of the fuel selector. The shutoff valve is operated by a control knob near the pilot's right knee. It was noted that the fuel shutoff valve follower handle was partially closed at the valve while the control knob was in the ON position. The firewall-mounted clamp that secures the cable housing was loose and the cable housing was able to slide back and forth in the clamp. The valve could be hand actuated from the on to off position without any significant movement of the control knob. With the fuel shutoff valve properly configured and in the full on position, another engine run-up was conducted to full power with and without the auxiliary fuel pump. AD 70-24-04 concerning the fuel shutoff valve was complied with in 1984 by installation of Cessna Kit No. SK117-10. The fuel shutoff control knob is required to be safetied in the 'on' position. No safety wire was in place and no hole was drilled in the subject knob to accommodate the wire. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_LAX98LA250.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2020 · Conference paper
Under Pressure: Decision Making in Aircraft Maintenance and the Role of Gender
In aircraft maintenance, leaders are under near-constant pressure to maintain airworthiness. Every minute an aircraft cannot fly due to maintenance represents financial waste.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗