NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR24FA156
Aircraft involved
Factual narrative
On May 19, 2024, at 1648 Pacific daylight time, an Extra Flugzeugbau GMBH EA 300/L, N22MW, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Bandera, Washington. The pilot, the sole occupant, was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot was planning to attend an annual International Aerobatic Club (IAC) aerobatic training camp in Ephrata, Washington. The pilot recently had a mishap with his airplane, an Extra NG, where it was damaged when the canopy opened during takeoff. Because his airplane was in maintenance, the owner of the accident airplane offered to lend the pilot his airplane to use for the aerobatic camp. The pilot had flown the airplane before and was on the owner’s insurance. The camp was starting on May 20, the day after the accident, and was structured to have a group of pilots participate for the first three days, followed by another group for the next three days. The first group of pilots were scheduled to land on the day of the accident to get a briefing at 1600 and sign in. The pilot indicated that he planned to get up on the morning of the accident and wait for favorable weather, mentioning he might have to wait until May 22 or 23. His camp was scheduled to start on May 22. He relayed to the organizers that his wife was driving over to the airport with the Certificate of Waiver (CoW) to be signed at the briefing. At 1450 on the day of the accident, one of the camps organizers asked the pilot if he would be at Ephrata that day to help give the briefing. The pilot responded that he would not make the briefing. The aerobatics training camp required a CoW from the Federal Aviation Administration, which was issued to the pilot. The CoW detailed the conditions and responsibilities under which the camp was allowed to conduct aerobatic flight activities in the designated area near the airport, including compliance with specific safety and operational provisions; it stipulated that failure to adhere to the conditions could result in the cancellation of the waiver and legal penalties. The CoW stated that “The holder of this certificate shall be responsible for the strict observance of the terms and provisions contained herein and that the pilot was the only person ‘authorized to activate and deactivate’” the aerobatic area; no other persons were delegated this authority. A review of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data revealed that the airplane departed Arlington Municipal Airport (AWO), Arlington, Washington at 1627. The airplane proceeded south-southeast until intersecting Interstate I-90 near Snoqualmie, Washington. The airplane then began to follow I-90 through a mountain pass while generally maintaining an altitude of 1,500 ft above ground level (agl) (see Figure 1 below). The canyon walls along the mountain pass reached up to 5,000 ft mean sea level (msl). Figure 1: Flight Path in Reference to the Destination Airport At 1647, the airplane initiated a 1,500 foot-per-minute climb, with its groundspeed gradually decreasing from 170 kts to 130 kts over a 20-second period. At 1648, the airplane passed to the south of Bandera State Airport after reaching an altitude of about 7,000 ft msl and then began a descent (see Figure 2 below). The airplane leveled off briefly and then began another, steeper descent. In the final seconds of data, the airplane started a 90° left turn the groundspeed reaching 185 kts at the last recorded hit. Figure 2: End of Flight Track The accident site was located on a north-facing slope of a densely forested mountainous terrain at an altitude of about 3,100 ft msl. The airplane came to rest among densely populated cedar and fir trees that reached up to 150 ft agl. The site varied in slope between 45°-60°. Numerous branches directly above the main wreckage displayed fresh breaks, and the top of one small fir tree had been severed. None of the nearby trees showed evidence of impact to their trunks. The debris field was estimated to be 100 ft in diameter, with the main wreckage in the center. The debris field consisted of pieces of clear plastic, fragmented composite, paint chips, and propeller splinters. The main wreckage included the engine, fuselage, wings, and empennage. The empennage was folded over the fuselage in a scorpion-like position. The wings came to rest partially embedded in the topsoil. The wing skin panels had shattered and were distributed through the debris field. The wing’s leading edges sustained the most severe damage and had shattered. Flight control continuity could not be established due to the severe fragmentation and crush damage of the fuselage. The seatbelt latch position at the time of impact could not be definitively determined. The upper lap belt on the pilot's seat appeared to be latched with the shoulder straps engaged. The tongues of the pilot’s lap belts showed evidence of deformation, consistent with the belts being engaged at the time of impact. The pilot’s parachute was attached and remained packed. Numerous pilots reported flying in the same area of the accident site earlier in the day. They reported isolated areas of heavy rain and poor visibility with moderate turbulence present in the pass. One pilot who was flying in the immediate area about 30 minutes before the accident, reported that the tops of the clouds were at 10,000 ft msl and dissipated as he flew west out of the pass. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_WPR24FA156.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (turbulence, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Explainable LiDAR 3D Point Cloud Segmentation and Clustering for Detecting Airplane-Generated Wind Turbulence
Wake vortices - strong, coherent air turbulences created by aircraft - pose a significant risk to aviation safety and therefore require accurate and reliable detection methods.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Does small-scale turbulence matter for ice growth in mixed-phase clouds?
Representing the glaciation of mixed-phase clouds in terms of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is a challenge for many weather and climate models, which tend to overestimate this process because…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗