NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN17LA290
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's low-altitude maneuvering, which exceeded the helicopter's performance capability in the high-density altitude conditions and resulted in a loss of control.
Factual narrative
On July 28, 2017, at 1532 central daylight time, a Helicopteres Guimbal Cabri G2 helicopter, N722TX, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain while maneuvering at the Beaumont Municipal Airport (BMT), Beaumont, Texas. The flight instructor and student pilot sustained minor injuries. The helicopter was registered to American Helicopter Leasing Corp and operated by Texas Rotorwing LLC as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The flight was not operated on a flight plan. The local flight originated from BMT about 1500.The flight instructor reported that he and the student had completed three normal approaches and then practiced basic hover skills at the north ramp area of the airport. A high engine oil temperature condition occurred during the hovering maneuver due to the ambient air temperature and the reduced airflow available for engine cooling. To increase engine airflow and reduce the engine temperature, he performed a low altitude circuit at 60 knots, about 100 ft above ground level (agl), around the perimeter of the airport. About halfway around the perimeter, the oil temperature had returned to the normal operating range and all other engine indications were normal at that time. However, during the turn at the southwest corner of the airport, the helicopter began to lose altitude and would not respond to his control inputs. His efforts to regain control were not successful and the helicopter impacted the open grass area on the airport southwest of the runway. The instructor noted that the helicopter was loaded within the gross weight and center-of-gravity limitations. He added that the turns were never more than 45 degrees angle of bank. He reported that there were no anomalies with regard to the helicopter, and that the high temperatures, low wind, and high density altitude likely resulted in the accident. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector responded to the accident site and conducted an examination of the helicopter. The flight instructor informed him that he was completing a turn, during which the helicopter was unable to maintain altitude. The helicopter came to rest on its right side. The main rotor blades were fragmented, and the tail boom was partially separated. Impact marks suggested that the main rotor had struck the ground followed by a landing skid. His examination of the flight control system did not reveal any pre-impact anomalies. Weather conditions reported by the BMT Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) did not include any wind information. The most recent observation recorded a temperature and dew point of 35 degrees Celsius and 21 degrees Celsius, respectively. The calculated density altitude was about 2,650 feet. Wind conditions reported by the Jack Brooks Regional Airport (BPT) Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS), located about 12 miles southeast of BMT, were variable at 4 knots at the 1453 observation and variable at 3 knots at the 1553 observation. The maximum engine power was derated as installed in the Cabri G2 helicopter to 145 hp for both takeoff and continuous operation. However, under the accident conditions, the engine was capable of producing approximately 160 hp. Application of full throttle by the pilot would be expected to provide 160 hp under the accident conditions. Engine performance was referenced to the 145 hp continuous limit, with 100% power corresponding to 145 hp and 111% power corresponding to 160 hp. In addition, the helicopter geometry implied that an angle of bank in excess of 40° would result in the main rotors impacting the ground before the landing skids. The helicopter manufacturer stated that at an operating weight of 1,440 lbs. (650 kg) about 90% engine power would be required to maintain an in-ground-effect (IGE) hover at 32 ft agl and 32°C. Application of full throttle (111% power) would have provided a 21% power margin for an IGE hover under the accident conditions. However, maintaining altitude in a 45° bank turn would require a 1.4 load factor which exceeded the available 21% power margin. The student pilot was practicing basic hovering skills under the supervision of the flight instructor. Due to the high air temperature and minimal airflow over the engine, the engine oil temperature had increased beyond the approved limits. The flight instructor decided to fly a low-altitude circuit along the perimeter of the airport to increase the airflow and cool the engine. The low-altitude circuit was performed at an altitude of about 100 ft above ground level and at a speed of about 60 knots. About halfway around the circuit, the oil temperature had returned to normal, and all other engine indications were normal at that time. However, during the turn at the southwest corner of the airport, which was about three-quarters of the way around the circuit, the helicopter began to lose altitude and would not respond to the flight instructor's control inputs. The flight instructor was unable to regain control, and the helicopter subsequently impacted the ground. Postaccident examination of the helicopter did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a preimpact failure or malfunction. In addition, the flight instructor stated that there were no issues with the helicopter before the accident. Impact marks showed that the main rotor blades struck the ground before the landing skids, which was consistent with a bank angle of at least 40° at the time of the accident. According to information that the helicopter manufacturer provided, the engine power and helicopter performance required to maintain altitude while maneuvering exceeded the power and performance available with the elevated density altitude conditions at the time of the accident flight, which resulted in a loss of altitude and an impact with the ground. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Instructor/check pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Aircraft capability-(general)-Capability exceeded - C
- C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-High density altitude-Effect on operation - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2017_CEN17LA290.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, loss of control). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Simulation Modeling Requirements for Loss-of-Control Accident Prevention of Turboprop Transport Aircraft
In-flight loss of control remains the leading contributor to aviation accident fatalities, with stall upsets being the leading causal factor. The February 12, 2009.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗